What Foucault book should I start with?

What Foucault book should I start with?

The Foucault Reader is a decent place to start. It will give you some smaller essays and snippets of his major book length works. If you want to start with a book length work, I would start with Discipline and Punish : The Birth of the Prison.

What should I read after Foucault?

Foucault and the Politics of Rights »

  • Convulsing Bodies » Religion and Resistance in Foucault.
  • The World of Freedom » Heidegger, Foucault, and the Politics of Historical Ontology.
  • Foucault Beyond Foucault » Power and Its Intensifications since 1984.
  • Who translated Foucault’s the order of things?

    Alan Sheridan
    Foucault, Michel. The Order of Things: An Archaeology of the Human Sciences. Translated by Alan Sheridan. New York: Vintage Books, 1994.

    What should I read before reading Foucault?

    The Republic by Plato (427-347 B.C.E.)

  • Leviathan by Thomas Hobbes (1588–1679)
  • Treatise of Government by John Locke (1632-1704)
  • A Treatise of Human Nature by David Hume (1711–76)
  • The Social Contract by Rousseau (1712-1778)
  • The Wealth of Nations by Adam Smith (1723 -1790)
  • The Rights of Man by Thomas Paine (1737-1809)
  • What is the best Foucault book?

    Discipline and Punish1975The History of Sexuality1976Madness and Civilization1961The Order of Things: An Archaeolo…1966The Archaeology of Knowle…1969Microfisica del Poder1978
    Michel Foucault/Books

    What is the order of things about?

    The Order of Things (1966) is about the “cognitive status of the modern human sciences” in the production of knowledge — the ways of seeing that researchers apply to a subject under examination.

    What does Foucault mean by human sciences?

    “The human sciences are not, then, an analysis of what man is by nature; but rather an analysis that extends from what man is in his positivity (living, speaking, labouring being) to what enables this same being to know (or seek to know) what life is, in what the essence of labour and its laws consist, and in what way …

    Is Michel Foucault difficult to read?

    MF’s books and essays through 1969 are quite difficult, as he adopts the style of writing common to French intellectuals in the 60s: complex syntax, a love of paradox, elliptical phrasing, an assumption of familiarity with a vast and deep culture–all designed to produce an effect of effortless brilliance.

    How difficult is Foucault?

    Is discipline and punish hard to read?

    Michel Foucault’s Discipline and Punish is one of the best-selling works of critical theory and a key text on many undergraduate courses. However, it is a long, difficult text which makes Anne Schwan and Stephen Shapiro’s excellent step-by-step reading guide a welcome addition to the How to Read Theory series.

    What does Foucault say about classification?

    A particular classification scheme really is a cultural code of interpretation, what Foucault usually calls “a discursive formation”—that is, a set of deep rules for ordering that is embedded in our language.

    What is genealogy Foucault?

    Foucault also describes genealogy as a particular investigation into those elements which “we tend to feel [are] without history”. This would include things such as sexuality, and other elements of everyday life. Genealogy is not the search for origins, and is not the construction of a linear development.

    What idea did Foucault reject?

    Some critics see Foucault as effectively belonging to the political right because of his rejection of traditional left-liberal conceptions of freedom and justice.